Presentation Reflection-WK10

Group Presentation 4: Conflict (Group Name: Kinecting the Boxes)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

This oral presentation was good and has a clear communication about the concept of conflict. The presentation should use the presenters their own understanding and words to explain the topic, but the presenters do more read than present.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The written presentation has a strong communication which explains the definition of conflict and the types of conflict in details. But the written presentation has too many words and the words were too small which is difficult to read. The whole sentences make listeners pay more attention to the written presentation. It should be short and concise which have the key words to make people understand the gist of presentation.  When the people listen the presentation, they would pay more attention to speaking of the presenters and not read too many words.

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

They gave not too much examples in the presentation. More examples could make listeners understand the topic easily.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes. They have references.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The content of the group presentation was general. However they should give more examples and link to their project in the presentation which makes people understand easily.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

The images were not too much in the presentation. And most images were not related to the presentation.