Presentation Reflection-WK11

Group Presentation 5: Remuneration (Group Name: Vivid)

Grade: PS

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

This oral presentation was good and has a clear communication about the concept of remuneration. However, the manner of presentation is too depressing which make audience listened like read note and could not grab the attention of audience.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

In the term of the written presentation, the layout and images make audience read easily. But the words is too much which make audience pay more attention on the presentation slider not the speaking of presenters.

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

They have gave some examples in the presentation about the pay slip. They want use these examples to make listeners interesting on this topic and understand easily. However, some listeners seem confused and lost.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes. They have references.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The content of the group presentation was general. If they could provide more specific examples of the topic could make audience understand easily.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

The images were not too much in the presentation. And most images were not related to the presentation.