Group Presentation: Communication (Group
Name: Shade of Black)
Grade: DN
Assessment Criteria
CLARITY
OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear,
concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The oral presentation have a clear
communicate to explain the concept of communication and link to their team’s
project. It is a good oral presentation and I could understand their
presentation totally and easily.
CLARITY
OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear,
concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The written presentation are very good and
have a clear communicate which show the communication efficiently and simply.
The written presentation used the key word of the theme of the presentation,
not the whole sentences, which make auditors read easily and understand
quickly.
DISTINCTIVENESS
AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the
particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?
Yes. The examples for the presentation
which they used is the communication of their own group of their project. This
example could make people understand deeply and have a strong support to the
theme of the presentation.
REFERENCING_
Are all sources of content properly referenced?
No. All references should be placed in an
individual slider pages.
THE
CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the
conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
The presentation have a good strong grasp
of the conceptual context for the presentation theme of collaboration.
THE
STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the
Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
Yes. The images they used in the
presentation could explain, support and extend the understanding of the
presentation well. These images could make audience understand the theme of the
presentation easily and quickly match up the written presentation.
No comments:
Post a Comment