Presentation Reflection-WK8

Group Presentation: Intellectual Property  (Group Name: Interactive Architecture)

Grade: CR

 

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The oral presentation has a clear communicate to explain the concept of intellectual property which includes the definition, different types, how to use and create it and many examples. It is a good oral presentation and I could understand their presentation totally and easily.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The written presentation is very good and has a clear explanation which shows the process of use and creates of different type’s intellectual property efficiently and simply. The written presentation used many example of the theme of the presentation. However, the written presentation has too many words and the words are too small which make people difficult to read.

 

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

Yes. The examples for the presentation which they used are the explanation of their own group of their topic. This example could make people understand deeply and have a strong support to the theme of the presentation. I think the presentation should link to their project and gives some example in their project for the intellectual property. But they did not show these examples of their project in their presentation.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?
Yes. All reference placed at the bottom of each example. But I did not see them. Maybe the words are too small or cover by something.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
The presentation has a strong grasp of the conceptual context for the presentation theme of collaboration. If the presentation has some example should link to their project which has more persuasion.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
Yes. The images they used in the presentation could explain, support and extend the understanding of the intellectual property wonderfully.