Presentation Reflection-WK10

Group Presentation 4: Conflict (Group Name: DCLD)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

This oral presentation was clear about the concept of conflict relates to their project and contains a large amount of information. However, some group members just read their notes without any eye contact and body language. It feels that they are not familiar with their present material and break sometimes.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The written presentation is good and simple which have a strong communication explain the definition of conflict and the types of conflict. They provided keywords and point forms in their slider which looks comfortable and continuous. The words of written presentation was small but it is still could watch and acceptable. However, the words in the slider was a little bit much which could put them in speaking. It is difficult to listen presentation and read slider at same time.

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

This group has given some examples about the conflict and solution. But they did not give some examples related to their team project. The topic is real large which could not easy to speak clearly and give some examples related to the project could make listener understand easily.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes. They have references.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The content of the group presentation which gives the definition and different types of conflict was general. The collaboration of group members is not good enough.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

The images were not too much related to the topic of the presentation which listener could not understand the theme from the images.