Presentation Reflection-WK10

Group Presentation 4: Conflict (Group Name: Kinecting the Boxes)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

This oral presentation was good and has a clear communication about the concept of conflict. The presentation should use the presenters their own understanding and words to explain the topic, but the presenters do more read than present.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The written presentation has a strong communication which explains the definition of conflict and the types of conflict in details. But the written presentation has too many words and the words were too small which is difficult to read. The whole sentences make listeners pay more attention to the written presentation. It should be short and concise which have the key words to make people understand the gist of presentation.  When the people listen the presentation, they would pay more attention to speaking of the presenters and not read too many words.

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

They gave not too much examples in the presentation. More examples could make listeners understand the topic easily.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes. They have references.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The content of the group presentation was general. However they should give more examples and link to their project in the presentation which makes people understand easily.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

The images were not too much in the presentation. And most images were not related to the presentation.

Presentation Reflection-WK10

Group Presentation 4: Conflict (Group Name: DCLD)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

This oral presentation was clear about the concept of conflict relates to their project and contains a large amount of information. However, some group members just read their notes without any eye contact and body language. It feels that they are not familiar with their present material and break sometimes.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The written presentation is good and simple which have a strong communication explain the definition of conflict and the types of conflict. They provided keywords and point forms in their slider which looks comfortable and continuous. The words of written presentation was small but it is still could watch and acceptable. However, the words in the slider was a little bit much which could put them in speaking. It is difficult to listen presentation and read slider at same time.

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

This group has given some examples about the conflict and solution. But they did not give some examples related to their team project. The topic is real large which could not easy to speak clearly and give some examples related to the project could make listener understand easily.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes. They have references.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The content of the group presentation which gives the definition and different types of conflict was general. The collaboration of group members is not good enough.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

The images were not too much related to the topic of the presentation which listener could not understand the theme from the images.

Flowgraph in CryEngine3

The flowgraph of the bathroom in Cryengine3
The light: http://youtu.be/SsbT75JYvSk
The door:http://youtu.be/rIlsS85zN7Q
The toilet: http://youtu.be/7a2nB1ahQU0
The handbasing: http://youtu.be/X1rNVZPPEE8
The shower: http://youtu.be/_WbChHoC-Eo

100%

 

Edit Materials of the bathroom in CryEngine3

During this week, I have edit the materials of the bathroom in CryEngine3 to make the materials looks realistic.
This is the video in CryEngine3.
http://youtu.be/KGNx_xXCt_I

Individual Milestone

For this project, we will use the CryEngine3 as the representation tool to show the liveable bathroom how to design and work. In this project, my role is working with the CryEngine3 software and makes the show and operates of the liveable bathroom in the CryEngine3 looks real. For the first weeks, I join in the design process of the bathroom with JingLiu and SiyanLi and provide some ideas to the design. And I research the Australia Standard of the bathroom which as reference used in the design process.

My main work is at the CryEngine3. At the first, I create a small town on an island as the environment in the CryEngine3 which placed 3 houses which have 3 different size bathroom which designed by JingLiu. Then I placed the 3 house on right place which have many components in the small town which export from Sketchup model to CryEngine3 by SiyanLi.

The building models in the red range, road, grass ground and environment was made by ourselves.

The others models was download from Google warehouse.

The models export from Sketchup to CryEngine3, most models will lost their texture. We should edit the texture in Photoshop and replace them in Sketchup and export again.

The building models in the red line range was edit by Siyan Li.

The others was edit by me.

Secondly, for the visualization, I removed the information display at the top right corner of the operation window in the CryEngine3.

Thirdly, I replace some texture in the CryEngine3 which make our project looks worse. When the actor walk in the CryEngine3, there would has some missed texture display on the ground. So I used Photoshop make a 4*4 pixels texture with an alpha channel that is completely black and replaced the missed texture in the CryEngine3.

In addition, there have some problem with the actor size. The actor in game could not walk through some door which fit the Australia Standard, such as the door of the shower room. I change the size of the game actor which make it could walk through the doors.

Next step, I am doing some research about the edit of materials in the CryEngine3. I want to make the materials of the bathroom looks realistic.

Presentation Reflection-WK8

Group Presentation: Intellectual Property  (Group Name: Interactive Architecture)

Grade: CR

 

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The oral presentation has a clear communicate to explain the concept of intellectual property which includes the definition, different types, how to use and create it and many examples. It is a good oral presentation and I could understand their presentation totally and easily.

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The written presentation is very good and has a clear explanation which shows the process of use and creates of different type’s intellectual property efficiently and simply. The written presentation used many example of the theme of the presentation. However, the written presentation has too many words and the words are too small which make people difficult to read.

 

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

Yes. The examples for the presentation which they used are the explanation of their own group of their topic. This example could make people understand deeply and have a strong support to the theme of the presentation. I think the presentation should link to their project and gives some example in their project for the intellectual property. But they did not show these examples of their project in their presentation.

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?
Yes. All reference placed at the bottom of each example. But I did not see them. Maybe the words are too small or cover by something.

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
The presentation has a strong grasp of the conceptual context for the presentation theme of collaboration. If the presentation has some example should link to their project which has more persuasion.

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
Yes. The images they used in the presentation could explain, support and extend the understanding of the intellectual property wonderfully.

Presentation Reflection-WK7

Group Presentation: Communication (Group Name: Shade of Black)

Grade: DN

 

Assessment Criteria

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The oral presentation have a clear communicate to explain the concept of communication and link to their team’s project. It is a good oral presentation and I could understand their presentation totally and easily.

 

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The written presentation are very good and have a clear communicate which show the communication efficiently and simply. The written presentation used the key word of the theme of the presentation, not the whole sentences, which make auditors read easily and understand quickly.

 

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

Yes. The examples for the presentation which they used is the communication of their own group of their project. This example could make people understand deeply and have a strong support to the theme of the presentation.

 

REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

No. All references should be placed in an individual slider pages.

 

THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

The presentation have a good strong grasp of the conceptual context for the presentation theme of collaboration.

 

THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Yes. The images they used in the presentation could explain, support and extend the understanding of the presentation well. These images could make audience understand the theme of the presentation easily and quickly match up the written presentation.